<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dark Horse Comics Goes Green&#8230; Washing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thegreenrocket.com/2009/08/20/dark-horse-comics-goes-green-washing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thegreenrocket.com/2009/08/20/dark-horse-comics-goes-green-washing/</link>
	<description>Helping the Green Community Take Off!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 15:00:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robb</title>
		<link>http://www.thegreenrocket.com/2009/08/20/dark-horse-comics-goes-green-washing/comment-page-1/#comment-1272</link>
		<dc:creator>Robb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 15:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegreenrocket.com/?p=646#comment-1272</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;re being a little harsh - they said they&#039;re &quot;going green&quot;, they didn&#039;t claim to be 100% carbon neutral or anything absurdly inaccurate, right? They&#039;re taking positive steps, we should be encouraging that. Claims about greenwashing should be left to those companies engaged in rampant labeling fraud, not the ones that are taking incremental steps to reduce their impact. What kind of message does it send to a company when they get lambasted for trying to do the right thing? Let them say they&#039;re going green, it&#039;s not misleading, you&#039;re just misinterpreting it. 

http://www.greenmeetup.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re being a little harsh &#8211; they said they&#8217;re &#8220;going green&#8221;, they didn&#8217;t claim to be 100% carbon neutral or anything absurdly inaccurate, right? They&#8217;re taking positive steps, we should be encouraging that. Claims about greenwashing should be left to those companies engaged in rampant labeling fraud, not the ones that are taking incremental steps to reduce their impact. What kind of message does it send to a company when they get lambasted for trying to do the right thing? Let them say they&#8217;re going green, it&#8217;s not misleading, you&#8217;re just misinterpreting it. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.greenmeetup.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.greenmeetup.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
